• Users Online: 67
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 121-126

The effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation clinical audit on the patient survival in the emergency room


1 Department of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Trauma Research Center and Department of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Department of nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Atherosclerosis Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Web Publication19-Feb-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Hosein Mahmoudi
Trauma Research Center and Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/atr.atr_58_18

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Background: The ability to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is among the most important professional skills for physicians and nurses. There is a wide difference among different countries respecting resuscitation success rate. Studies show weaknesses in performing resuscitation. Objectives: This study aimed at assessing the effects of clinical audit of CPR in the emergency room based on the Situation Stabilization Model (SSM). Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was done in 2017 in the emergency room of Baqiyatallah Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Using the Adib checklist, 35 resuscitations were assessed based on the steps of clinical audit. Then, a 1-month educational program was held for the resuscitation staffs in the study setting. Then, 35 new resuscitations were assessed using the same checklist. Finally, the results of the two measurements were compared. Results: There were significant differences between two measurement time points regarding the mean scores of different resuscitation skills (P < 0.001). Primary resuscitation success rate increased from 6 (17.1%) cases at baseline to 8 (22.9%) of the cases after the intervention. This increase was not statistically significant (P = 0.47). Conclusions: Clinical audit in the emergency room based on the SSM improves the quality and the success rate of CPR. The success rate is in our study increased. Furthermore, the reported data were not statistically significant for improving the success rate; it is clinically important. Because primary resuscitation success rate increased from 6 (17.1%) cases at baseline to 8 (22.9%) cases after the intervention. These findings highlight the necessity and the importance of the clinical audit of care services as well as the implementation of educational interventions based on the existing weaknesses. Given the great importance and sensitivity of resuscitation, health-care staffs need to receive regular theoretical and practical in-service resuscitation-related training.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, clinical audit, emergency room


How to cite this article:
Moridi J, Mahmoudi H, Ebadi A, Rahmani A, Moradian ST. The effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation clinical audit on the patient survival in the emergency room. Arch Trauma Res 2018;7:121-6

How to cite this URL:
Moridi J, Mahmoudi H, Ebadi A, Rahmani A, Moradian ST. The effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation clinical audit on the patient survival in the emergency room. Arch Trauma Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 20];7:121-6. Available from: http://www.archtrauma.com/text.asp?2018/7/3/121/252549




  Introduction Top


Cardiac arrest is the leading cause of about 60% of deaths among patients with cardiovascular diseases.[1] The postarrest survival rate is about 5%. One of the major factors affecting post-arrest survival is the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).[2] Any one minute delay in starting the CPR reduces the survival rate 2.2%.[3] Moreover, the quality of CPR as well as CPR technicians' competence is among the most important factors behind CPR outcomes.[4]

The results of studies on medical and nursing students revealed that they had limited CPR-related knowledge and skills.[5],[6],[7] Moreover, another study showed that although senior medical residents had moderate-level knowledge about basic and advanced CPR, they were unable to appropriately use their CPR-related knowledge and skills, particularly the ventilation-compression ratio.[8]

There is a wide difference among different countries regarding post-CPR survival rate.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] The results of a study in Iran indicated that primary CPR success rate was 15.3%, from which 10.6% of patients were discharged. Follow-up assessments of the discharged patients revealed that only 8% of them survived during the first 6 months after hospital discharge.[14] The results of another study indicated that 64.4% of patients died during CPR, 28.4% of them survived only several minutes, and just 7.2% of them had a long-term survival, from which 2.8% developed brain lesions.[15] Another study revealed that most CPRs were futile (93%) and just a few patients who had undergone CPR were discharged from hospital either with or without brain lesions (1% and 6.5%, respectively).[16] Moreover, Dolatabadi et al. found that 63% of resuscitated patients experienced death and only 27% were discharged.[17] Idris et al. also did a study on 10371 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and reported that blood circulation restoration as well as 24-h survival and discharge rates were 34% and 9%, respectively.[18] These rates in a study made by Razi et al. were 55% and 12%, respectively.[19] Miranzadeh et al. also reported that 95.2% of CPRs in their setting were unsuccessful and only 4.8% of patients who had undergone CPR survived to hospital discharge.[2]

Despite the wealth of studies into CPR success and post-CPR discharge rates, there are limited information about the quality of performing CPR and the accordance of performed CPRs with the existing standards and guidelines. One of the models which can be used to evaluate the quality of CPRs is the Situation Stabilization Model (SSM). SSM holds that stabilization is a dynamic process which starts as early as patient entrance into the emergency room, focuses on nurses, patients, and family members' behaviors, and finally results in situ ation stabilization. SSM assesses realities, functions, and factors behind care provision.

One of the main components of SSM is clinical audit. Through the clinical audit, the quality of health-care providers' clinical practice is constantly compared with clinical standards and guidelines and then, appropriate measures are taken to promote their practice. Consequently, it helps maintaining the stability of patients, nurses, and health-care organizations, enhances care quality, and improves patients' health.[20],[21],[22],[23] The steps of clinical audit include: choosing the area of auditing, assessing the status quo, identifying standards, comparing the status quo with the standards, developing and implementing appropriate measures, and re-auditing.[24],[25]

Objectives

Considering the poor quality of CPR performance and available data about the role of clinical audit, the present study was made to assess the effects of SSM-based clinical audit of CPR in the emergency room.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study design, sample, and setting

This quasi-experimental study was done from February to November 2017 in the emergency room of Baqiyatallah Hospital, Tehran, Iran. The study population consisted of patients who were transferred to the emergency room to undergo CPR. In addition, medical staffs that were the member of the CPR team were included. Patients were included if they aged eight or more, were diagnosed with respiratory and cardiac arrest and needed CPR.

Based on mean and standard deviation reported in a previous study,[26] and considering an α of 0.5, a power of 90%, and a β of 10%, the Altman Nomogram showed that 35 patients were needed for each group. Participants were recruited to the study consecutively using the census method. Totally 70 cases, 35 before intervention and 35 cases after the intervention were included. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, (ethics approval code: IR. BMSU. REC.1394.145). The study has also registered at Iranian registry for clinical trials (IRCT201507012730N6).

The study objectives were explained to the medical staffs who were invited to participate in the study, and the informed consent was obtained.

Initially, 35 cases of CPR done from February to May 2017, in the study, setting was assessed using a standard checklist (the control group). The researcher was standing in the corner of the CPR room and assessed the CPR quality based on the checklist. He did not have any role in implementing the CPR. After that, a focus group with research team members was done and accordingly, the weaknesses in the practice of the CPR team were identified. Then, a 1-month educational program was implemented in June 2017 for CPR staffs in the study setting based on the results of primary assessments. The program was taught by an emergency medicine specialist. Educational materials were provided through the lecture method, video presentation, pamphlets, and practical exercises. After the program, 35 new cases of CPR were assessed from July to October 2017 using the same checklist (the intervention group).

Data collection tool was a basic and advanced CPR skills checklist which covered different aspects of CPR including chest compression and artificial ventilation (19 items), endotracheal intubation (14 items), defibrillator use (15 items), and CPR management (3 items). The instrument developed by Adib-Hajbaghery and its content validity ratio and index of the checklist were reported to be 0.85 and 0.89, respectively [Table 1].[11] In addition, an outcome of CPR such as the success of CPR was recorded.
Table 1: Adib-Hajbaghery's cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills checklist and skill successfully demonstrated before and after intervention

Click here to view


Data management and analyses

The data were analyzed using the SPSS software (Version 16.0., Chicago, SPSS Inc) and by running the Chi-square and the independent-sample t-tests.


  Results Top


In total, 70 cases of CPR ware assessed most CPRs were performed at the night shift (38.6%) and on male patients (68%). Most patients suffered from internal medicine disorders. The means of patients' age in control and the intervention groups were 62.5 ± 17.2 and 67.2 ± 18.4, respectively. Moreover, CPRs in these groups lasted on average, 41.4 ± 14.5 and 36.4 ± 7.4 min, respectively. There were no significant differences between the control and the intervention groups respecting patients' gender, age, and underlying conditions as well as the length of CPR and the working shifts in which CPRs were performed (P > 0.05).

In some skills, such as pulse check, aid request, and compression to ventilation ration, the staff matched with standards completely. However, they had lower competencies in the airway management skills such as cleaning the airway before breathing. These skills were improved after the intervention.

[Table 1] shows the percentage skill successfully demonstrated before and after the intervention.

[Table 2] shows the pretest and posttest mean scores of CPR skills. The results of the paired t-test showed that the groups differed significantly from each other respecting the total score of CPR skills as well as the score of its chest compression dimension (P < 0.001). Baseline success rate (i.e., in the control group) was 17.1% (6 cases). After the intervention (i.e., in the intervention group), this rate increased to 22.9% (8 cases). However, the results of the Chi-square test indicated no significant between-group difference regarding CPR success rate [P = 0.47; [Table 3]].
Table 2: The mean scores of different dimensions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Click here to view
Table 3: The frequency distribution of cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Our results illustrated that SSM-based clinical audit of CPR increased CPR success rate from 17.1% (6 cases) to 22.9% (8 cases). Moreover, it improved the scores of the chest compression, defibrillator use, and management dimensions of CPR. In line with our findings, Asadi and Pollard also reported that intensive evidence-based training and exercises improved CPR staffs' interpersonal coordination, reduced the rate of doing undue tasks, and increased CPR success rate.[27] Sadeghi and Saffarzadeh also found that training CPR staffs significantly improved CPR quality.[28] Adib-Hajbaghery also reported improved CPR quality following interventions such as practical CPR training, CPR exercises, and periodical CPR evaluations.[29] Similarly, Dal reported that regular CPR training, constant supervision, and exercising CPR skills in regular intervals significantly improved CPR quality.[30]

The results of the above-mentioned studies indicate that CPR quality can be improved through the careful supervision of all CPR steps as well as the correction of errors and faults. Although most studies reported the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving CPR quality, the depth and the stability of learning may vary based on the methods of providing educations. The most important factor behind the effectiveness of educational interventions is to provide educations based on the weaknesses of CPR staffs. Systematic evaluation, identification, and minimization of weaknesses can save money and time and improve CPR quality. Our findings revealed that even competent and specialized CPR staffs may have weaknesses. However, the clinical audit can help identify and overcome such weaknesses and thereby, it can produce better CPR outcomes. Through critical analysis of the quality of the provided care services, clinical audit not only directly improves the quality of the services but also can be used as an educational tool as well as a mechanism for further advances.

Previous studies reported that CPR success rate varied widely in different settings. For instance, Dolatabadi et al. reported that 93% of CPRs were unsuccessful and only 7% of 64 resuscitated patients were discharged from hospital either with or without brain lesions (6.5% and 1%, respectively).[17] Salari et al. also reported that 64.4% of patients who had undergone CPR experienced death, 28.4% had a short-term survival, and only 7.2% had a long-term survival. They also reported that 2.8% of the survived patients had brain lesions.[31] Primary CPR success rate in other studies was reported to be 32%,[32] 44%,[33] 52%,[34] 44%,[35] and 46%.[36] Such a wide difference in the CPR success rates in previous studies can be due to the differences in the settings, samples, CPR staffs' competencies, available CPR equipment and facilities, CPR onset time, CPR quality, and success rate assessment protocols in these studies.[37] Further investigations are needed to identify factors behind CPR success rate. In addition, the success rate in this study was not statistically significant, but it seems that increased two people to the survived people is very clinical significant. Hence, the clinical audit and implementing the educational intervention based on its results could improve the quality of care.

The primary CPR success rate in the present study was 17.1% which is almost higher than the previous studies probably due to the fact that in our study setting, most CPRs were led by emergency medicine residents and specialists. Moreover, based on the findings of the previous studies, CPR success rate, in general, has significantly increased in recent years.[38],[39]

One limitation was crowded emergency department which was makes it more difficult to collect information during CPR. Other limitations were small sample size in each phase, the short follow-up period of the study, and its nonblind design.


  Conclusions Top


SSM-based clinical audit in the emergency room improves CPR quality and success rate. Furthermore, the reported data were not statistically significant for improving the success rate, it is clinically important because primary resuscitation success rate increased from 6 (17.1%) cases at baseline to 8 (22.9%) of the cases after the intervention. The success rate is a multifactorial variable that affected with many factors. All factors are not assessed in our study. These findings highlight the necessity and the importance of the clinical audit of care services as well as the implementation of educational interventions based on the existing weaknesses. Given the great importance and sensitivity of CPR and CPR skills, CPR staffs need to receive regular theoretical and practical in-service CPR training. The clinical audit can be used in different clinical settings to improve care quality.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the participants for their earnest cooperation in this study and thank the Baqiyatallah University and Trauma Research Center for their support.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Ibrahim WH. Recent advances and controversies in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Postgrad Med J 2007;83:649-54.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Miranzadeh S, Adib-Hajbaghery M, Hosseinpour N. A prospective study of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation and its related factors. Trauma Mon 2016;21:e31796.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mehra R. Global public health problem of sudden cardiac death. J Electrocardiol 2007;40:S118-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mundell WC, Kennedy CC, Szostek JH, Cook DA. Simulation technology for resuscitation training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2013;84:1174-83.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mahoori A, Hassani E, Noroozinia H, Amiri Kar M. Evaluating the knowledge of Urmia university medical students about adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Urmia Med J 2010;21:260-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mäkinen M, Axelsson A, Castrén M, Nurmi J, Lankinen I, Niemi-Murola L, et al. Assessment of CPR-D skills of nursing students in two institutions: Reality versus recommendations in the guidelines. Eur J Emerg Med 2010;17:237-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Josipovic P, Webb M, McGrath I. Basic life support knowledge of undergraduate nursing and chiropractic students. Aust J Adv Nurs 2009;26:58.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kumari KM, Amberkar MB, Alur SS, Bhat PM, Bansal S. Clinical awareness of do's and don'ts of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among university medical students – A questionnaire study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:MC08-11.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Borimnejad L, Nikbakht Nasrabadi A, Mohammadi Mohammadi H. The effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation workshop on nurses' sustained learning. Iran J Med Educ 2008;7:209-15.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Khoshrang H, Heidarzadeh A, Asadi A. Assessment of the effects of education in clinical skills center on cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge of physicians and nurses working in educational therapeutic centers of guilan university of medical sciences in 2004. Res Med Educ 2007;7:7-13.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Adib-Hajbaghery M. Longitudinally investigation of the skills of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nurse interns of Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Cardiovasc Nurs 2014;3:6-17.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bekhradian N, Khalili A, Bargrizan S, Motlagh AH, Paymard A, Vahdatnejad J. Comparison of knowledge of medical and paramedical intern about of CPR, 2015. Health Sci 2016;5:128-31.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Omidifar N, Yamani N, Changiz T. The efficacy of new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in promoting knowledge and skills of 4th year medical students. Iran J Med Educ 2008;8:23-31.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Goodarzi A, Jalali A, Almasi A, Naderipour A, Kalhorii RP, Khodadadi A. Study of survival rate after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in hospitals of Kermanshah in 2013. Glob J Health Sci 2014;7:52-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Salari A, Mohammadnejad E, Vanaki Z, Ahmadi F. Survival rate and outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Crit Care Nurs 2010;3:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
McKibbon KA. Evidence-based practice. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1998;86:396-401.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Dolatabadi AA, Setayesh A, Zare M, Hosseinnejad A, Bozorgi F, Farsi D. Descriptive analysis of contributing factors in outcomes of emergency department CPRs. Crit Care 2005;9:P302.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, Brown SP, Brooks SC, Callaway CW, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2015;43:840-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Razi RR, Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Peek ME, Fisher T, Edelson DP, et al. Racial disparities in outcomes following PEA and asystole in-hospital cardiac arrests. Resuscitation 2015;87:69-74.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Shamsi V, Mahmoudi H, Sirati Nir M, Babatabar Darzi H. Effect of job specialization on the hospital stay and job satisfaction of ED nurses. Trauma Mon 2016;21:e25794.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Moayed MS, Mahmoudi H, Ebadi A, Sharif Nia H. Stress and fear of exposure to sharps in nurses. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 2016;10:e3813.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Mahmoudi H, Mohammadi E, Ebadi A, Taheri F. Stabilizing the situation in an emergency ward: A grounded theory study of how emergency nurses provide care in emergency wards. Crit Care Nurs J 2017;10:e11603.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Moayed MS, Mahmoudi H, Ebadi A, Salary MM, Danial Z. Effect of education on stress of exposure to sharps among nurses in emergency and trauma care wards. Trauma Mon 2015;20:e17709.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Levy B, Rockall T. The role of clinical audit in clinical governance. Surgery (Oxford). 2009;27:367-70.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Vahidi RG, Tabrizi JS, Iezadi S, Gholipour K, Mojahed F, Rasi V. Organizational facilitators and barriers to implementing effective clinical audit: Systematic review. Journal of Pakistan Medical Students 2013;3:38-45.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kavosi A. Effect of continuing education competency-based program for emergency nurses on rate CPR successful. Q J Nurs Manage 2015;4:19-28.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Asadi HK, Pollard J. Fully successful resuscitation despite prolonged cardiac arrest. Saudi J Anaesth 2011;5:314-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
28.
Safari S, Tabrizi JS, Rouhi AJ, Sadeghi-Ghyassi F, Ghojazadeh M, Rouhi AH, et al. Family members' attitudes regarding family presence during resuscitation of adults: A systematic review and meta analysis. Ann Anesthesiol Crit Care 2016;1:e10204. DOI: 10.5812/aacc.10204.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Kohpaye Zadeh J, Mehrabi H, Ranjbar H, Shoghi M, Zeighami Mohammadi S. The effect of multi-media educational software on learning basic principles of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in nursing students. J Crit Care Nurs 2014;7:160-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Dal U, Sarpkaya D. Knowledge and psychomotor skills of nursing students in North Cyprus in the area of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pak J Med Sci 2013;29:966-71.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Salari A, Mohammad Nejad E, Vanaki Z, Ahmadi F. Effect of in-hospital cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation management on resuscitation outcomes. J Crit Care Nurs 2011;4:13-22.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Assar S, Husseinzadeh M, Nikravesh AH, Davoodzadeh H. The success rate of pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Ahvaz training hospitals. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016;2016:9648140.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP, Larkin GL, Nadkarni V, Mancini ME, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: A report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the national registry of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2003;58:297-308.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Eftychiou C, Georgiou M, Andreou A, Michaelides A, Yiangou K, Deligeorgis A, et al. Nicosia general hospital cardiac arrest team:First year's practice and outcomes of in-hospital resuscitation. Hellenic J Cardiol 2009;50:264-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Singh S, Namrata AG, Gautam PL, Luthra N, Tanwar G, Kaur A. Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for patient outcomes and their predictors. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:UC01-4.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Fennelly NK, McPhillips C, Gilligan P. Arrest in hospital: A study of in hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. Ir Med J 2014;107:105-7.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Cooper S, Janghorbani M, Cooper G. A decade of in-hospital resuscitation: Outcomes and prediction of survival? Resuscitation 2006;68:231-7.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Ozcan V, Demircan C, Engindenizi Z, Turanoglu G, Ozdemir F, Ocak O, et al. Analysis of the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an emergency department. Acta Cardiol 2005;60:581-7.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Gombotz H, Weh B, Mitterndorfer W, Rehak P. In-hospital cardiac resuscitation outside the ICU by nursing staff equipped with automated external defibrillators – The first 500 cases. Resuscitation 2006;70:416-22.  Back to cited text no. 39
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed134    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded17    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal